Nutrinaut publishing standard

Editorial and Corrections Policy

The standards used to write, source, review, correct and archive Nutrinaut Tools content.

A human-owned publication process

Every published page names Eugene Blago as the accountable publishing owner and carries a method version and update date. Drafting assistance may be used, but nothing is auto-published: calculation logic, examples, claims and links are checked against the cited sources before release.

Standards for every page

  • Writing must be original and useful beyond the calculator interface.
  • Numerical or health-adjacent claims require an adjacent primary or official source.
  • Examples are labelled fictional and are not testimonials or recommendations.
  • Uncertainty, exclusions and product heuristics are stated where a reader uses them.
  • No invented quote, credential, case study, review badge or clinical authority is permitted.
  • Advertising or affiliate relationships cannot set an editorial conclusion.

How a report is handled

  1. Receive the URL, observed issue and supporting detail.
  2. Reproduce a calculation error or check the disputed claim against its source.
  3. Correct code and copy together when they share a method.
  4. Run reference fixtures and affected route checks.
  5. Update the method version or content date and add a visible note for a material change.

Email [email protected] with “Correction” in the subject. Do not send sensitive health information.

When content is archived

We remove or return HTTP 410 for pages that cannot be substantiated, duplicate a stronger tool, imply diagnosis, require specialist review we do not have or cannot deliver a complete user outcome. Unknown routes return 404 instead of a generated fallback page.